.net, C# tip

An extension method for .NET enumerations that uses the DescriptionAttribute

Sometimes little improvements make a big difference to my day to day programming. Like when I discovered the String.IsNullOrEmpty method (I think it came into .NET Framework way back in v2.0) – when I was testing for non-empty strings , I was able to use that super useful language feature without having to remember to write two comparisons (like myString != null && myString != string.Empty). I’ve probably used that bit of syntactical candy in every project I’ve worked on since then.

I work with enumerations all the time too. And a lot of the time, I need a text representation of the enumeration values which is a bit more complex than the value itself. This is where I find the DescriptionAttribute so useful – it’s a place supplied natively by .NET where I can add that text representation.

I’ve provided a simple example of this kind of enumeration with descriptions for each item below – maybe for a production application I’d localise the text, but you get the idea.

public enum Priority
    [Description("Highest Priority")]
    [Description("MIiddle Priority")]
    [Description("Lowest Priority")]

But I’ve always felt I’d love to have native access to a method that would give me the description. Something like:


Obviously it’s really easy to write an extension method like this, but every time I need it on a new project for a new client, I have to google for how to use types and reflection to access the attribute method, and then write that extension method. Then I think about the other extension methods that I might like to write (what about ToDisplayName(), that might be handy…), and how to make it generic so I can extend it later, and what about error handling…

…and anyway, this process always includes the thought, “I’ve lost count how many times I’ve done this for my .NET enumerations, why don’t I write this down somewhere so I can re-use it?

So I’ve written it down below.

public static class EnumerationExtensions
    public static string ToDescription(this Enum enumeration)
        var attribute = GetText<DescriptionAttribute>(enumeration);
        return attribute.Description;
    public static T GetText<T>(Enum enumeration) where T : Attribute
        var type = enumeration.GetType();
        var memberInfo = type.GetMember(enumeration.ToString());
        if (!memberInfo.Any())
            throw new ArgumentException($"No public members for the argument '{enumeration}'.");
        var attributes = memberInfo[0].GetCustomAttributes(typeof(T), false);
        if (attributes == null || attributes.Length != 1)
            throw new ArgumentException($"Can't find an attribute matching '{typeof(T).Name}' for the argument '{enumeration}'");
        return attributes.Single() as T;

I’ve split it into two methods, so if I want to create a ‘ToDisplayName()’ extension later, it’s really easy for me to do that. I might include it in a NuGet package so it’s even easier for me to re-use later. I’ll update this post if I do.

Wrapping up

This was a quick blog post covering a simple area, about something that bugs me – having to rewrite a simple function each time I start a new project. I can imagine a bunch of reasons why this isn’t a native extension in .NET Framework/Core – and my implementation is an opinionated extension. I’m sure there’d be a lot of disagreement about what good practice is. Anyway, this class works for me – I hope it’s useful to you also.

About me: I regularly post about Microsoft technologies and .NET – if you’re interested, please follow me on Twitter, or have a look at my previous posts here. Thanks!

4 thoughts on “An extension method for .NET enumerations that uses the DescriptionAttribute

    1. Ha – good point, my (bad) reason is double checking for things when really there’s no need. I’ve updated the code to remove that check, thank you for commenting!

    1. Nice! I really like this pattern, it gets around the reflection speed challenge. I would like to try using BenchmarkDotNet to see how much the ConcurrentDictionary improves performance over my implementation (which has no caching). Thank you!

Comments are closed.